Zidane might be more flashy but Iniesta is more intelligent.I don’t think you can use the point of what trophies they’ve won to determine who is better. I watched him through his career and there were many games he was average. Zidane might have come very deep but he didn't control a agme anywhere the level Xavi has, noone has to be honest.

I think he has a better footballing brain between the two. because Zidane was so good at hold up play and turning from defense to offense, the team could remain very balanced.Ok i have to ask, what tasks do fall into the role of a 10 that Iniesta doesn't have to do? For one, he owned the 2006 World Cup without a doubt and was a key player for Juventus.

That's not what they did. His playstyle is also better becase he doesn't hold to the ball as much as Zidane did, he makes the team play.New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be castPress J to jump to the feed. Barcelona great Xavi Hernandez will self isolate after testing positive for coronavirus.

Best player at a Euro? No one actually knows, i think Iniesta is better but some guy might say Zidane is and at the end of the day theyve won the same so we cant prove it(even then some people feel trophies are unfair, see Messi and Ronaldo vs Pele and Maradona). I, Skeletor, am Master of the Universe!and xavi marked by 3 man,seriously? by Blue Barrett on Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:13 pm. Game winning goal in a World Cup Final? Gerrard confirms Balogun’s injury ahead Livingston match

They can both play in the same XI.

Who is the real G.O.A.T? If they swapped they would underperfom ( to their standards). It's not even close, Zidane vs. Gerrard is closer than that lmao. It's like asking whether you wanted Laudrup or Iniesta to dictate your games. Pick one!

3.Iniesta. Plus in Zidanes best years, which was at Juve he played in front of s three man CM, he was nevere really a dictator. Share your thoughts, experiences and the tales behind the art. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcutsCookies help us deliver our Services. Not taking away from Xavi at all, but it has to be Zidane.Both are great but it goes to Zizu for me. All Rights Reserved. The entire debate is also pointless because im not going to budge on my opinion and neither is a ZZ fan.Just getting sentimental with the news of Iniesta possibly moving on.I mean it’s not meant to be convincing in any way I think it’s good to be able to share your opinion without seeking to change others. Now. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcutsCookies help us deliver our Services.

Iniesta vs. Zidane . Check.

Xavi is better I think. They have a lot of similarities, and Xavi is currently the best midfielder in the world, definitely.

Xavi or Zidane?

Personal reasons stops Mahrez from traveling to Botswana with Algeria You might also like. Check.

Prev Post Ibrahimovic’s link to Man United prevented Liverpool move – Klopp. Check.

Xavi himself confirmed it, Zidane said so too, even Pep Guardiola said Scholes is a guy he would like to have on his Barcelona team. Although I can see why, I always preferred Iniesta's style of play and he is my favourite footballer of all time.They were pretty different. He just had that something in him. Zidane has always seemed to be on another level when discussing all-time great midfielders, whether it's due to his grace, influence, trophies, international play, or ability to deliver in the clutch.But put side by side with Iniesta, there isn't one thing Zidane accomplished (as a player) that Iniesta hasn't. Iniesta has reached mythical heights.I think that Iniesta has came to that level when I can objectively say that he is on par with Zidane.