His command of history, science, economics and theology, combined with thoughtful and informed insights, cut through the fog of the other pundits’ narratives, right to the core issues plaguing society today. Here is the complete list from Alinsky. How he was always advocating the “Fundamental transformation of America”? Once the public demands change at the legislative level, they use the force of law through threat of lawsuits, imprisonment, censorship, wealth transfers and the trumping of certain rights in order to bring about “equality” in the slow and painful march toward Utopia.The purpose of exposing the Alinsky method is to equip the next generation to identify and defeat these divisive tactics. A few notable adherents to the “Alinsky Method” include: Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven (Modern social justice and progressive advocacy groups who use modified Alinsky tactics include: the Remember president Barack Obama’s campaign slogan “Change we can believe in” and his constant proclamations of “hope and change”? Playboy Magazine. … (1997).
"Playboy Interview: Saul Alinsky".

The dividing lines they polarize people on are most often racial, socioeconomic, religious, and political. This management of conflict heightened awareness within the community as to the similarities its members shared as well as what differentiated them from those outside of their organization.Symbol construction helped to promote structured organization, which allowed for nonviolent conflict through another element in Alinsky's teaching, Alinsky received criticism for the methods and ideas he presented. Many people aren’t even aware that they are being manipulated; in essence weaponized against their fellow man. As Saul Alinsky said himself in the forward to his book:For nearly 30 years, John Loeffler’s Steel on Steel program has been the ‘Rosetta Stone’ to help decode the rhetoric of the Progressive movement and defeat Dialectical Postmodernism. “Never go outside the expertise of your people. Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals. Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic RadicalsRules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic RadicalsJohn Loeffler breaks down some of Alinsky’s most effective rules and how to defeat them.John Loeffler ‘The Road Back: A Guide to Restoring Our Nation’Copyright © All Rights Reserved 1990-2020 Steel on Steel Productions Social justice warriors engage in large scale social engineering by unfreezing a society using chaos to create a legal precedent for change, then refreezing it in a new predefined shape. March 1972.Stall, Susan, & Stoecker, Randy. President Jimmy Carter actually handed out copies of this to people in his administration) * RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” In 1971, a hard Left, Progressive community organizer named Saul D. Alinsky, wrote a playbook of subversive tactics called “Rules for Radicals” to empower an upcoming generation of change agents and progressive tacticians. As adherents to the Cloward-Piven strategy, they use their collective force to appeal to, or coerce, sympathetic political platforms and those in higher authority. Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals is a 1971 book by community activist and writer Saul D. Alinsky about how to successfully run a movement for change. His goal was to create a guide for future community organizers, to use in uniting low-income communities, or "Have-Nots", in order for them to gain social, political, legal, and economicpower.

In Chicago in the 1980s as a community organizer, lawyer and “agent of change” himself, Barack Obama studied Saul Alinsky’s methods and made these rules a central part of his political identity and public policy.Activists and change agents attempt to end-run constitutional rights with social contract and dialectic consensus methods. “Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. COMM-ORG Papers. "Community Organizing or Organizing Community? Often, this would be a local politician or agency that had some involvement with activity concerning the community. On the 4th fly-leaf page, after a dedication to Alinsky's wife Irene and quotes from Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins— or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — LuciferThe use of common enemy against a community was another theme of Alinsky would find an external antagonist to turn into a "common enemy" for the community within which he was operating.
Robert Pruger and Harry Specht noted that much of his instruction has only been effective in Pruger and Specht also questioned the philosophy of community organization found in Alinsky-style organizing has also been criticized by Susan Stall and Randy Stoecker as ineffective, and even destructive, to communities and public perceptions of community organizing for its: (Hillary Clinton wrote her college thesis on these communist principles. Gender and the Crafts of Empowerment." Stall and Stoecker describe these issues between the public and private split in community organizing, and gendered organizing tactics as the difference between After Alinsky died in California in 1972, his influence helped spawn other organizations and policy changes. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. The next time a Progressive opens his or her mouth, be armed with this playbook so you can spot the tactics they employ and from whom the argument originates.

1. “ It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Excerpted from Saul Alinsky’s book: Rules For Radicals, published in 1971. Their most effective weapon is ridicule, but they won’t hesitate to use violence, threat of violence, shaming, bullying, doxxing, and similar strategies in order to silence their opposition.Always in motion toward change or “progress”, the main goal of change agents is to cause social instability through subversive and divisive rhetoric. The last book written by Alinsky, it was published shortly before his death in 1972. The endgame is to overload the bureaucracy with social spending programs and class warfare to the point that hatred and division cause social panic and a demand for change.Once they’ve created a problem they propose themselves, or at least those in power with the same ideology, as the answer. Inside of it, Alinsky compiled th…