I know they are dialects of the same family of language called lisp, but what exactly are the differences? When comparing Clojure vs Racket, the Slant community recommends Racket for most people.In the question“What is the best programming language to learn first?”Racket is ranked 5th while Clojure is ranked 19th. The ability to turn Racket into any language you like is also attractive. I found a lot ofHealthy blog, thanks for the post. Although Racket is a great first language, it's definitely not a "toy language". I think Clojure does something similar its meant to simplify Scheme for the JVM nothing more. Scheme has vectors, I believeCommon Lisp has reader macros, which allow you to use new brackets (as does Racket, a descendant of Scheme).Scheme and Clojure have hygienic macros, as opposed to Common Lisp's unhygienic onesAll of the languages are either modern or have extensive renovation projects. Unlike the points in the article, interop is a very compelling reason to choose Clojure over Racket. Featured on Meta "Strongly typed dynamic language" is marketing. And we are in the process of integrating it into the Racket release. The difference is that Common Lisp uses #() for vectors and no syntax for hash tables. ABOUT RACKET I have been using Racket (a dialect of Scheme) for several years to teach kids how to program. @Scott, you make a very compelling argument for Racket. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. I would think Racket is even easier to learn than Scheme due to the community and focus of the language. Every time I have to start a JVM it feel like my Macbook freezes for a few seconds. Because I wanted to use some Clojure ideas in Racket, not use Clojure. Racket vs. Clojure I've been asked by several people to explain why I use Clojure for my professional work rather than Racket. Your code's quality? By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Doing this way ensures many more people will be helped by a good answer.this is good, but perhaps you should mention that racket is more than "just" scheme; it's a system that supports multiple (but related) languages (you can even define your own). Frankly, I have yet to find a Java library I'd actually want to use. "Free resources to learn Racket" is the primary reason people pick Racket over the competition. The Overflow Blog site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under One way to boost your fun is to use the right equipment. data structures", what is the primary advantage of the immutability? Could you give an overview, if possible, covering topics such as syntax, characteristics, features and resources.Common Lisp has vectors and hash tables as well. Your code's efficiency? Something about Java seems to turn every library into an insanely complex explosion of classes, and Java programmers mistakenly seem to think that JavaDoc-produced lists of every single class and method constitutes "good documentation". – andrew cooke Jun 27 '12 at 10:36 Notably, it is not enforced--you don't The languages have somewhat different design philosophies. If Clojure was not on the JVM and didn't have Java interop, I doubt it would be anywhere near as popular as it is today, simply because it would lack libraries for very simple things.There are a number of mentions in your post about 'reports' of things.
Racket, Clojure, and Common Lisp are probably your best bets out of the 22 options considered. and scheme is edging towards more standard libraries (that also include oo) with r6rs, which racket supports. I certainly miss pattern matching of Haskell and it would be great to have that. "Some people love Clojure specifically because it sits on top of Java and gives them access to their favorite Java libraries. The fact is C++ was not always popular, it only seems to be popular today because of a history of updates. The most important reason people chose Racket is: I think Java has it right as far as the adapt part is concerned. Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkersProgramming & related technical career opportunitiesI'm asking for a more general overview of the differences because I fell like this question can be useful for many other people, sorry if it is sounds abusive.I always get confused about which post should go where. This is a discussion of tools, so is it a question for here or programmers? They are simply the most awesome way to compose implementations I have ever seen.Regarding Clojure's STM and agents, can you provide citations for your claims?Thanks Sean, for clarifying Clojure's mechanism for combining default implementations.In support of Racket, we have come up with a library of data structures in Typed Racket (a statically typed dialect of Racket).